Why make a New Catholic Church Mass after Vatican II?
Why the Catholic Church build a new Mass after Vatican II. When comparing the two, both are very different. The official definitions of the two masses are surprisingly different.
Traditional Latin Mass
The Mass is the very special and the sacrifice of the New Law In it Jesus Christ, through the ministry of the priest gives his Body and Blood of God the Father under the appearances of bread and wine for a mystical immolation unbloody a form of renewal and a memorial of the Sacrifice of the Cross.
Novus Ordo Mass
The Lord's Supper or Mass is the assembly or gathering of people, the people of God with the priest presiding to celebrate the memorial of the Lord. For this reason, the promise of Christ is particularly true of the local congregation of the Church: "Where two or three are gathered in my name, there am in their midst."
- The Catholic Church will always be How to Restore Tradition Back The Church was before Vatican II?
- Why are traditional Catholics do not agree with Vatican II and the Novus Ordo Mass?
- Why are traditional Catholics, strongly criticizing the Vatican II and the Novus Ordo Mass?
- About Brainwashed Catholics are the blood and body of Jesus?
- Why are traditional Catholics, strongly criticizing the Vatican II and the Novus Ordo Mass?
The dough is quite appropriate, valid, powerful, and it is entirely lawful.
In reality, both explanations are true.
The first is the traditional, the second is more modern, liberal, and was designed to appeal to what was thought at the time as "ecumenical" sensitivities.
At any time in Jesus Christ becomes present to us at the altar, the work of salvation is actually being achieved, and Jesus, the propitiation for the sins of the whole world, is really and substantially in our midst.
That is what the Mass. .. Misa Misa any and every … concerned.
Why not?
My friend …. Fantastic question.
These days it is often hard to believe that the Novus Ordo Mass has been given to us of the great Bride of Christ who gave us the TLM.
I encourage you, however, to maintain a strong faith in the infallibility of the Church. Most of the changes that you see running rampant throughout the bodies of today are not even allowed (or is allowed only in extreme circumstances) by Vatican II. It was not so much the Vatican Council II, but the "spirit of Vatican II" which has resulted in so many liturgical abuses.
I recommend you read on the subject. Fisheaters.com is a wonderful site.
Feel free to send an email if you have any questions.
I think it adds some things that were more "Protestant" in nature, with the hope of attracting back into the fold.
Basically it was the drop in membership. Fewer shoots in the church, less money being generated.
The Latin mass is formed so outdated. The Catholic church is losing people fast and needed to upgrade the mass would be wiped from the face of the earth.
Tridentine MASS
The Eucharistic liturgy was held in the Latin rite according to the Roman Missal promulgated by the Apostolic Constitution Quo Primum of Pope Pius V on July 14 1570. A revised Missal was issued by the Council of Trent in order to unify what by then had become a variety of "Roman Rite which had proliferated since the Middle Ages. "For four centuries the floor of the priests of the Latin rite of the rules for the celebration of the Eucharistic Sacrifice, and heralds of the Gospel led almost the entire world" (Pope Paul VI, Apostolic Constitution, the Roman Missal promulgated by decree of the revised Vatican Council II, April 3, 1969). (Etym. Latin Tridentinus from Tridentum, ancient form of Trent.)
NOVUS ORDO MASS
The Sacrifice of the Eucharist as the central act of worship of the Catholic Church. The "mass" is a form of late missio (sending), from which the faithful are sent to put into practice what they have learned and use the graces they have received in the Eucharistic liturgy.
As defined by the Church in the Council of Trent, in the Mass, "The same Christ who offered himself once in a bloody manner on the altar of the cross, and is offered in a way unbloody" . Accordingly, the Mass is a true propitiatory sacrifice, which means that by offering this "the Lord is appeased, He grants grace and the gift of repentance and forgives the sins and errors, even more serious. Because it is one and the same victim. The is now offering through the ministry of priests and then offered himself on the cross. The only difference is the way to offer "(Denzinger 1743).
The Mass can not be understood apart from Calvary, which is a re-presentation, memorial, and effective implementation of the merits gained by Christ. *
The two bodies have similarities, but also have their differences. What you have to understand is that "difference" does not always constitute a "bad" - as is the case with the Tridentine and Novus Ordo Masses.
Since the two formulations are acceptable for the Church, we can be sure they are acceptable to God.
It is wrong to assume that one has to choose between a formula for the Mass or the other. Not bad to have our personal preferences - but when those personal preference to start a compell vilifying other masses as well as those who celebrate the Mass itself becomes an object of idolatry. No?
If you prefer to worship God through the Tridentine Mass, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. I prefer the Novus Ordo, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.
Children and nostalgia are a bad combination.
Policy. This is all BS anyway.
I see the same reunion objective of tranfiguration bread and wine into the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ. The language is different, and some of the ways in which the priest is, but considers that the provisions have not changed. You need to talk to and get a bishop of the horse's mouth. Then ask your question. Okay?
nothing about Latin, but switched to enlish that I could see was not sure what you are saying.
Because the Bible says that only needed a sacrifice Hebrews 7:27 KJV
Needeth not every day, as the high priests, to offer a sacrifice, first for his own sins and then for the people: in this he did once, when offered himself.
so the Catholic had to change the observation that the last supper … that is a lie
cousin of the church is wrong