Now that the Vatican has listed pollution as a sin, you may now call global warming a religion?
The Pope has come to say that climate protection is extremely important for the whole human race, and now the pollution is a sin in the eyes of the Catholic Church.
Do not make this so-called "global warming" a religion, and if it enters the separation of church and state?
Showing the same film Algora be showing the movie "The 10 Commandments" in schools?
I know that just being silly, but we already know that the belief that humans are causing climate change is a kind of religion.
Taking such a leap of faith to believe that humans can cause heating, cooling, hurricanes, tornadoes, etc etc
It is also a religion, because it ignores any science, and not allow the debate on the issue.
This religion also allows indulgences in the form of "carbon credits". Persons who violate the commandments of the religion can purchase absolution by purchasing these things.
When you think AGW is a state run religion.
No, even people willing to take a leap of faith can not deny science when the evidence is overwhelming.
Global warming theory has been studied and confirmed the theory of evolution. Do you deny that the theory as well? Will they then claim that the earth is 6000 years old? Maybe you stop believing in the gravitational theory and simply float away?
Unfortunately, denial will not just disappear, they will put on the consequenses faster and more severe effects.
Pope says only that the pollution was a sin. Schools do not teach children to pollute the same, because they do not teach children to kill or steal. The Catholic church is not really into the whole of the creation of new religions, either. Actually, your question (or series of sub-questions) is not a problem.
Nope. It's just scientific fact.
This is science and what counts is the data.
"I was not convinced by any one person or interest group is the data I have. I was totally convinced of this connection between the burning of fossil fuels and climate change. And I was convinced that if not anything about it, we would be in serious trouble. "
Vice Admiral Richard H. Truly, USN (r)
Former NASA Administrator, Shuttle Astronaut
Here are two summaries of the mountain of the revised data that truly convinced Admiral and the great majority of the scientific community, short and long.http: / / http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Ima…http:// IPCC-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report ….
summarized as: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report …
There is a lot less controversy about this is the real world is on Yahoo answers: http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/a …
And much less controversial in the scientific community than you can guess from the few skeptics talked about here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_…http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi / content / fu …
"There'sa better scientific consensus on this [climate change] than on any issue that I know … Global warming is almost a no-brainer at this time. You really can not find intelligent, quantitative arguments to make it go away. "
Dr. Jerry Mahlman, NOAA
Good websites for more information: http://www.nrdc.org/globalWarming/f101.a…http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/sci…http://www.realclimate.org
"climate science from climate scientists" http://environment.newscientist.com/chan …
Religious speech has been worrying the political and scientific ages.Whats going to hurt another? Do not make one wonder if we are to escape despite the primitive philosophy. Each and every generation is under some kind of apocalyptic dilemma. If you spawn with the consensus of science, religion or politics.
It's great when things like this because deniers. It is solid proof that they have nothing sensible to say.
The church also forbids the killing. Should the murder also fall under the separation of church and state?
Say fifty Hail Mary's. Then do it all over again.
You could not show the film because TIT break some of the commandments … "No Th'all lie."
"Th'all not bear false witness."
If anyone is above the concern is the acronym (The Inconvenient Truth)
Is thinking like yours that has the Moon!
global warming is a religion - a belief system are united by faith, not science.
In that stupid "movie": no, it would not be the same: at least the Ten Commandments have a social redemption to the quality of your item.
I fear that the Catholic Church proclamations have no impact on the reality of the rest of the world. Ergo, there is no "global warming" a religion, and that what makes a religion out of gravity.
I thought that God made the rules, which gave the Pope the right to put the ore in
Why not? Some Christians are calling for evolution "atheistic religion". His suggestion makes much sense!
lol
it is a religion … lol
MEH .. only for people who are beginning to "hinder the pollution," because "it is a sin." But actually, global warming doesent fill the criteria of a religion (which still doesent fill the criteria of an ideology that matter! Enviromentalism .. I think what he meant. Enviromentalism is an ideology, but its certainly not a religion lol) just because the Christian dogma doesent cover theyre doing something that religious theme itself (that's like saying: "Christianity says that killing is wrong, it would not be a religious murder must be done well to kill ") lol. total nonsense xD
The Vatican says nothing new.
Wait 80 years and only remember that you have about Laughter sin.
Well, Al Gore is the degree of Divinity ……
I think it is a convergence of "repent or the end is near" crowd ……. There are clear similarities between the "carbon footprint" and the original sin - - - the notion that human life is itself a pox on the earth.
no sense that we ask, without any connection.
Pollution is a sin, whether or not the Church dictates, which is damaging to people doing that should be considered a sin, being you, you or a greedy corporation.
Your question makes no sense. This is the fusion of social conscience and religion. The Pope is trying to turn the seriousness of global climate change so that religious people can understand because they have chosen to ignore and reject all the scientific evidence. In any case, the argument for global climate change more valid.
Nice try Dr. Jello. ?
churches must be powered by solar energy .. The sun to return to the father!
Global warming has nothing to do with religion, they never look the same.
Global warming is science, religion is morality. Discussions on climate change are based on real evidence, not religious debates have evidence from both sides.