What is your opinion about this analogy?
Christian 33% (approx) World Religion
Anglican, Catholic, Evangelical, Jehovah's Witnesses
Latter-day Saints, Orthodox, Pentecostal, Baptist,
Christian Science, Scientology: etc
Different denominations beliefs than you or no entry into heaven, 33% of some of them are gay, not saved, have not been to confession in years, living in sin … the list goes on. The different religions are in conflict to the right. Only a few examples that reduce their chances of entry into heaven. All Christians believe that only those who believe that Jesus died for our sins, come close to heaven. This school of thought is removed the rest of the world, including Jews, the people of Jesus. Conservative, only 15% of the world 's population will be in heaven and are Chritians. That in itself is not logical. I find it hard to believe that Jesus would condemn the Jews. Why did God create a world full of people only to condemn them?
- What is your opinion on this quote?
- Jews, Christians, others, any person. So what do you do this?
- What is your opinion if a government or a corporation will be headed by a Catholic priest.
- "Catholics pay too much attention to the Virgin Mary" - What is your opinion?
- What is your opinion of Catholics call themselves Christians?






Hi,
We differ on many points on religion, but is on track one way. Above religions are not the common sense. They must make sense.
I wish you luck!
Has created a world full of people to receive as much as it was passable in the same world and the world was made through him and the world did not know him.He came to him and his own did not, but like many who you were given the right to become children of God, even those who believed in his name which were born not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man but of God.
Go created a world full of people to show love and mercy. Most people simply do not want to return to love him, because he expects them to act a certain way.
I suppose that if one family hated each other and their children and robbed and killed each other, you do not have the discipline or attention or punishment. You do not establish rules that should treat others. You are more than loving God.
For all their statistics, which is completely wrong about "All Christians believe that only those who believe that Jesus died for our sins, come close to heaven." Ironically, the feeling can be read otherwise in the Roman Catholic Catechism , which represents the beliefs of over 55% of Christians. The truth is, only about 15% (if that) maintain that the only people who are saved are those who accept the facts surrounding the replacement Atonement. The world of the second largest denomination (about 17% of Christians) do not even believe in Atonement replacement first, and is traditionally Universalist (ie, claims that all people be saved).
Jews are chosen people, are in disbelief, but now before they are created according to the Bible.
What are those who rise from the dead to be redeemed and becomes more in the future.
What about those who believe in particular redemption?
Can you think every time that most Christians believe that all good people who are saved? That has to be greater than 15%.
I never asked my belief in the world of the census so I'm sure its way
In my opinion, you do not know the meaning of the word "analogy". But the rest of your argument makes sense.
Well, that's not an analogy *, but …
I like the way you are thinking.
I believe this: God made all, and he made us as
INDIVIDUALS.
It is our individual soul that matters, not what 'group' they belong to. GROUP * no *, people, race or culture is judged by God as inherently superior to another ….. because that would lead to the conclusion that God waste his time doing everything else, which is absolutely ridiculous. It would also be a justification for slavery, or rulership, which means that it would be immoral. God sees and judges as a result all human beings as unique individuals. That might not be "traditional", but that's my thought on it, and my intuition, to examine the situation. Søren Kierkegaard philsopher is a good read, if you agree with the concept. 'Works of Love "and" Purity of heart "are two of his excellent and thoughtful work that affect this.