The Virgin Mary has Jesus have brothers? I would love to answer many religious Please.
I am Catholic and have given this much thought lately (see the way in which Advent). I was asked by one of my friends why Catholics believe that Mary was a virgin even after Jesus was born (she thinks that Mary was a virgin until Jesus was born, and then normal conjugal relations with Joseph). To explain it in a non-religious use the following logic. Makes sense to me, but I wonder what the people of various religions (atheists too, please) think about it.
Have you made the brothers of Jesus / Mary was a virgin?
I have to say that Jesus had no siblings and that Mary was a virgin. I can also back it up with an argument that is not based on religion, but rather on the basis of science and socio-economic structure of the biblical period in the Middle East. I would like to divide into parts so it is easy to understand.
Part 1
Let's accept that the Bible describes a person who really exists (ie Jesus), can be used as a reference for the overall structure of the life of Jesus how he plays. You do not even have to believe in God to believe that there was a guy named Jesus who was a bit of a revolutionary time.
Part 2
Women's Bible in the Middle East is generally attributed to one man. That man could be your husband, father, brother, brother, son of the law, or a good relationship. Unless a woman was capable of maintaining itself some exceptional circumstances (very rich family, prostitute, royalties) that a man would. Mary was not rich, not royalty, not a prostitute (she did get married after all).
Part 3
We know that Joseph was alive at least until Jesus was 12 years old. There is a gap of 18 years in the Gospels. We see Jesus, when Mary is 12 after he lost and then found hung in the temple talking with the rabbis there. We note the following when the wedding in Canna 18 years later. Nothing was said about what happened during those 18 years. However, Mary is now traveling around Jesus, and Joseph is not in sight. Because of this, we can assume that Jesus is now the caretaker against Maria Jose Jose is already dead. It is very common that young women to marry much older men, so that widows are totally normal at that time.
Part 4
Because Joseph was surprised when he learned Mary was pregnant, we can safely assume that it is not Jesus' biological father. We know he was alive during the first 12 years of marriage to Mary, who died before their 30th anniversary of Mary (when the wedding took place in Cannes). Therefore, if they had sex who were between 12 and 30 years to procreate.
Part 5
Birth control at the time was very minimal. It is very common to have many children. We know that Mary reproductive system worked because it was capable of carrying Jesus, and give birth without adverse effects later. When there is a problem with fertility, the problem is usually with the female. Female reproductive systems are much more complicated. Everything rides on the success of an egg compared to men a system in which a few thousand bugs are not big problem. Taking into account the fact that control was minimal at birth, the chances of Mary and Joseph never procreate after 12-30 years of sex are very rare.
Part 6
Just because other children are not mentioned in the Bible does not mean he does not exist. However, as Part 2, a woman had to be connected to a man in Biblical times. When Jesus was on the cross, he knew he was dying and that Mary will be attached to the other. The obvious choice for a woman are:
His father (who was dead)
Her husband (who was dead)
His son (dying)
His son in law from her girls (not all)
Her other children (not any)
This makes the question of "how do we know that no other child or children in the laws?"
Part 7
While Jesus was dying he told his mother (Mary) that one of his disciples (which is never mentioned by name) was to be his new son, and that this disciple was to treat Mary as his or her own mother (ie, be their guardian). There would be no need to allocate to each of his new charges if he had an obvious choice as another child or a son in law. This would simply mean that any children / child if there were laws. Furthermore, we assume that single women are not brothers, because it would have to relinquish her as a sister or wife to the disciple, and he never gets anyone to care.
Given the above information, I think it is reasonable to assume that Mary was a virgin and that Jesus was an only child. You can reach this conclusion, even if you are an atheist.
- Mary was a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus Christ. Why do Catholics say it is "always a virgin"
- Catholics … Do you accept that Mary remained a virgin permanent?
- Catholics Can Answer These Questions About Mary? ?
- Why do Catholics pray to the Virgin Mary?
- Do you think the Virgin Mary is the Mother of God "?
This is a 2-part question. I will keep the first part - and I think we do not have all the answers - just a lot of "what the Federation …" It seems funny that people who know nothing about on molecular / cellular biology are absolutely convinced Mary * has * to have sex, or somehow had vulvar human exposure to some pre-***. Not necessarily. In fact, it is very unlikely * but totally biologically / medically possible for the historical Jesus of Nazareth was the product of a "virgin birth." Any responsible scientist admitted over the world * not * know that we know. So here we go … Be forewarned, if you can not wrap your mind around transgender issues, do not read … First, know that there is a difference between the genotype (our genetic code) and "phenotype" (how the code is expressed / played out). At some point in each of our embryogenesis, each of us bipotential gonads develop that over time, either in differentiating testes (46, XY) or ovaries (46, xx). Mary - immaculately conceived by her mother through the Grace of God, and free of original sin - could have been 46, XX (phenotypically and genotypically "female"), with gonadal mosaicism * (gonads are testes hand, Part ovaries). We see it - granted, very rarely - in the real world today. If a true hermaphrodite, which were examined and self-identified as women. Then, it is theoretically possible that she could have had a fusion of neighboring 23, XY and 23, XX germ cells in order to make a 46, XY genetic male (Jesus), or have been subjected to parthenogenesis, the method of asexual reproduction seen in other species in the world today. If this were the case, then it may have been able to impregnate by Joseph. Another option is that Mary is a 46, XY with testosterone and a lack of sensitivity (which looks and self-identify as women) and have the persistent müllerian duct syndrome - just enough to carry a pregnancy after undergoing parthenogenesis . If the latter were the case, she could not have been fertilized by Joseph, and Jesus "brothers" may have been more likely their cousins.
Regardless, I think it is perfectly possible that the historical Jesus of Nazareth was 100% genotipically of the Virgin Mary, and 100% spiritual King David and the Hebrew God, the Blessed and Glorious YHWH.
Its been several hours since you posted this, so I'm sure by now someone has mentioned that the New Testament was written in Greek. The word for brother, Adelphe, has its roots in the sense of the same matrix. When used in a spiritual sense, or to show a mutual link, you can tell by the context. Some people suggest that the brothers and sisters of Jesus mentioned in the Bible, were actually cousins, but it is a Greek word for cousins, anepsios.
Matthew 1:25 Jesus calls uion prototokon first born. If he was the only child born of Mary, who could have been written uion monogenic.
In John 19, Jesus tells the disciple whom he loved about Mary, saying that led to his own from that time. The word home, in your own home is because it is not in italics in the text. Could mean in their own family or care, or the heart?
John, the apostle whom Jesus loved, was of Galilee and the crucifixion took place in Jerusalem.
Forty days later, in the upper room in Acts 1 Mary is said to be there with Jesus' brothers, so it seems that the disciple and his care was not necessary.
It is very evident in the word of God that Jesus had brothers after he was born. Mary was a virgin when Jesus was conceived, however, not being that way after he was born.
From a secular / historical point of view, is always destined to be a mystery. The historian can make assumptions about a typical family in that region and time, but it is not surprising that there is little reliable information on this concrete, the twenty-first century Nazarene peasant and her husband.
If we accept the premise, as Christians, that Jesus was born of a virgin (why not - it's Christmas!) O no, I do not think the debate in which Mary and Joseph had typical normal marriage after Jesus. I do not think devout Christians or not Christians have a particular interest either way in establishing whether or not Mary and Joseph have sex and take other children.
If there is an uneasiness over the idea that Catholic Mary never * throw its virgin state, I sympathize, but can not affect or support the theory.
Virgin Mary when Christ was born
Isaiah 7:14
Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin with the child and give birth to a son and call him Immanuel.
Matthew 1:23
"The Madonna with child and give birth to a son and call him Immanuel" which means "God with us."
Matthew 1:25
but kept her a virgin until she gave birth to a son and called his name Jesus.
Jesus brothers mentioned in the Scriptures.
Matthew 12:46
While Jesus was still speaking to the crowd, his mother and brothers are outside, they want to talk to him.
Mark 3:31
Then Jesus' mother and brothers arrived. Standing outside, sent someone to call.
Luke 8:19
Now, Jesus' mother and brothers came to see him but were unable to get near him because of the crowd.
Acts 1:14
They all united in prayer constantly, along with women and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with his brothers.
Wow that was long.
Mary was a virgin when Christ was born. Maria de Jesus was a mortal body, his father's God, Jesus received the power over death. If it were not so Christ could not have overcome the death and no one could be saved.
After the birth of Christ, but not biblicaly registered, there is a tradition that Christ was a brother of Mary and Joseph through one of which was the same James who wrote the biblical book of the same name. I do not see anything wrong with the idea of the doctrine of Christ having siblings.
I am an atheist, and I agree for the most part. However, I think it is important to remember that the virgins get pregnant all the time, even today. Which has no penetration to achieve fertilization. Before ejaculation could easily have been in question, or any kind of sex that matter, whether any amount of his semen vulva touched at a given time, a pregnancy is possible (granted, the chances are remote, but it is not unknown). This would explain the seeming shock Joseph, as it almost did not understand biology as well as we understand it today. A virgin birth is far from divine.
There are references to Jesus having brothers in the gospel. I'm Baptist and I know that my church teaches that she was a virgin, but she had a husband and that she had needs. Sex is not a sin so why not have it. Children are a big part of marriage at that time because Jesus was not the son of Joseph, it would be like a failed marriage.
A time to read, but if Mary had other children. Mary was a virgin when Jesus was born, but later she was not. The Bible says that Jesus had brothers.