Comments on: Catholics, what do you think this anti-Catholic comments I have?

By: cristoig

cristoig — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:40:35 +0000

That is really a strange understanding of confession. Without doubt, it shows a lot of creativity and imagination, but very little real understanding. Where do they come with this nonsense?
This is a letter of mine, which explains the Sunday on my blog: http://fiatvolvntastua.blogspot.com/2009 …
God bless!
In Christ
Fr Joseph

By: Kevin S

Kevin S — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:40:35 +0000

I think this is what happens whe you force someone's religion … I'm Catholic … and am making my confirmation, but it was my choice. I came to God on my own.

By: ~RY~

~**RY**~ — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:40:35 +0000

What do you think?
Well … is more than the same bullcrap, really. This is another case of someone who strikes blindly and fans before the investigation of faith.

By: Jim ((C.A.B.))

Jim ((C.A.B.)) — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:40:35 +0000

Sounds like one of the sects has done something wrong holder resting on reconciliation information. Does not sound like someone who actually knows something about our faith to me. Pax Christi

By: Roman C

Roman C — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:40:35 +0000

I think this person is lying.

By: clusium1

clusium1 — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:40:35 +0000

Sounds like this person is telling a story right?

By: Ave Maria

Ave Maria — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:40:35 +0000

LMAO! She is lying. She does not even understand what it is.

By: SpiritRo

SpiritRo — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:40:35 +0000

It seems that concern the general question of how often, but not really catechically taught by Trent.
The frequency is a matter proposed to each individual penitent. The mandatory annual confession was always a part of education. Press confession permission was granted only for adults. Apparently not hate anyone per se, but rather RICA resentment at the lack of what was taught her, not you personally. Your question just provided the vehicle for their relief.
It also appears that RICA, as well as SDA, a Protestant church by choice, are not able to convey what really is the confession as the Catechism of Trent. As a "reconciling" is indicative of a backward approach.
If the author was qualified teaching (as the nuns gave) or if it was in 3rd grade learning that he, RCIA does not fall at the elementary level, and counterproductive in many of those who are smart enough to want learn and understand. Too little, too are not successful in the development of holiness. Both are RICA SDA and are guilty of this.
RCIA is the error "Vatican 2" replacement for the Catechism of Trent, of Fr. Of Harb or the Douay, all of which carry the Imprimatur of the true Church, and two of which are now online and available. Discussions with other Catholics have concluded the same.
This is just a sad part now beaten by the state of Vatican 2. There sacraments perfect and should not be violated by Vatican 2. No sense at least, to violate the matter and form of valid sacraments, making them invalid. Try to get the traditional teachings, away from RICA highlighting the role of sacrament in reverse what is aligned with the Protestant versions. It is the penance comes first, not "reconcile". But it could be explained better in private. The penance in itself absolve the penitent is through the law of perfect contrition, not taught by the RICA system more.
That alone is worrisome.

By: lyn1136

lyn1136 — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:40:35 +0000

Ah! I see someone drank the kool-Day Adventist aid.
APS are the most virulent of the fight against Catholics, and they focus almost exclusively on sabbatical issues that poster did.
What do I think of it? It was a very bad Catholic catechism. Unfortunately, we have many of those these days.
ETA: I just saw that she responded to this question too. I clicked on his profile and sure enough …. she is a member of the Adventist Church.
Damn I'm good.

By: 1Oᴄᴀᴎᴇ [God help the Giants]

1Oᴄᴀᴎᴇ [God help the Giants] — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:40:35 +0000

Aye Aye Aye, sounds like a load of ……. Bilis ignorant not so pleasant. Unfortunately nothing new here. It also sounds like esto''persona was disturbed by what becomes now en''alojamiento for men and above all to themselves, and corruptos''Mi answer would BHSC!.
Susan is a former católico''supuestamente''which has already seen the light and be born again. Unfortunately he never saw the light in the first place, and that's the problem!.