Why are the books that are in the Catholic Bible that are missing from the Protestant Bible?
The reason the Vatican is not written in the Bible of King James, is that the writings of the Vatican had nothing to do with the Word of God.
The Bible, the Scriptures of the Old Testament and New Testament, preserved for us in the Masoretic text (OT) Textus Receptus (New Testament) and the King James Bible, is verbally inspired of God and plenarily. It is the inspired, inerrant, infallible and absolutely true, accurate and authoritative Word of God, and therefore the supreme authority in all things.http: / / www.av1611.org/attack.html
Here is the proof:
The vatcian openly admits they alone wrote the Apocrypha. But see what the Word of God says:
"Knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of any interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit. "2 Peter 1:20-21
"I testify to every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book: If you add any of these things, God will add to him the plagues that are written in this book: And if a man is taken out of the words book of this prophecy, God will remove his hand from the book of life, and out of the holy city, and one of the things that are written in this book. "Revelation 22:18-19
"The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve this generation forever. "Psalms 12:6-7
As God had promised, he has preserved his word for the English people in the King James Bible. Proverbs 16:10 says, "A divine sentence is in the lips of the King …" Ecclesiastes 8:4 says: "When the word of a king is, there is no power …" King James . "James" is not an English word but a Hebrew word. Did you know that the Hebrew word for James is Jacob! You'll never guess what Psalm 147:19 says, "He shows you His Word JACOB …"
- Why the Catholic Bible has more than 7 books in the Protestant Old Testament? Did not God say not to?
- Why are some books of the Bible Protestant Catholic excluded in One?
- How many books have Protestant Do you have a Bible? And Catholics?
- Discover the King James Bible
- Do you believe in the Bible, King James Version O Say Porn.
Modern Protestant Bibles are modeled in the King James Version, which was the first widely circulated English language Bible. Several books in the Bible were declared Catholic "apocryphal", which means that it was not clear that they were inspired by God.
Of course, for many of us throughout the Bible is divided into the same category.
The books of the Apocrypha were written during the time between the Testaments, "after the priest Ezra, but before the rise of Christianity. The priesthood of Ezra is arbitrary cutoff date for the divine inspiration, but it represents the end of an era, as Jews had been dispersed to distant places and Jewish religious thought was not all under the direct control of a single authority in Jerusalem .
The writings show a development of Jewish thought, including the adoption of some of the metaphysical interpretations of other cultures, particularly in the afterlife. There was nothing in them that did not parallel the development of ideas in the Jewish culture, but it became a problem when placed alongside some of the oldest texts of the Bible, at least from a Jewish perspective.
The Christians, moreover, came from Jesus' time, when such ideas are common and readily accepted in all that the Septuagint (the Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures) that the new books. Between these books, there were suggestions that could be read on behalf of the dead, among other things. These ideas helped establish the Christian doctrine until the time of Luther.
However, in order to survive a hostile reaction from the Roman hierarchy to its reform efforts, Luther Church to undermine the authority, and therefore, formulated a doctrine that human effort had no effect on salvation. The statements found in some books of the Apocrypha were in his way, so that the Jews had not used the included as an excuse to drop them.
Protestants have fully accepted each of the 27 books selected for the Catholic New Testament more than 1500 years ago.
The difference in the Old Testament actually goes back to the time before and during the life of Christ. At this time, there is no official Jewish canon of Scripture.
The Jews in Egypt translated their choices of the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek in the second century before Christ. This translation of 46 books, called the Septuagint, with extensive use in the Roman world because most Jews lived far from Palestine in Greek cities. Many of these Jews spoke only Greek.
The early Christian Church was born in this world. The Church, with its bilingual Jews and more and more Greek-speaking Gentiles, used the books of the Septuagint as their Bible. Remember that the first Christian documents were written in what became the New Testament.
After the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem, with increasing persecution from the Romans and competition from the fledgling Christian Church, the Jewish leaders met and declared the official canon of Scripture, eliminating seven books of the Septuagint .
The books were removed Tobit, Judith, 1 Maccabees, 2 Maccabees, Wisdom (of Solomon), Sirach and Baruch. Parts of the books were also removed including Psalm 151 (from Psalms), parts of the Book of Esther, Susanna (from Daniel as chapter 13), and Bel and the Dragon (from Daniel in chapter 14).
The Christian church was filled with the Holy Spirit does not follow suit, but keeps all the books in the Septuagint. 46 + 27 = 73 Books total.
1500 years later, Protestants decided to keep the Catholic New Testament but change its Old Testament canon of the Catholic canon to the Jews.
The books that were removed supported such things as
• Prayer for the dead (Tobit 12:12, 2 Maccabees 12:39-45)
• Purgatory (Wisdom 3:1-7)
• Intercession of saints in heaven (2 Maccabees 15:14)
• Intercession of angels (Tobit 12:12-15)
Books that fell sometimes called the Apocrypha.
Here is a website of the Catholic Bible: http://www.nccbuscc.org/nab/bible/
With love in Christ.
This is a blog site, but the person who answered that he has done a great job in explaining why the Catholic Bible has seven books that Protestants Bible.http: / / archangel703.blogspot.com/2007/11 …
The main reason: Martin Luther removed because he disagreed with them. He also wanted to remove the Letters of James and revelations, but John Calvin convinced him to keep those. There was too much in the books that said the Catholic dogma and beliefs so they decided to get rid of them and say they were following the Jewish Torah.
The real answer:
Martin Luther considered several scriptures from the Bible to be "uninspired." According to its doctrine of "sola scriptura," Scripture is considered inappropriate for the establishment of Christian doctrine. However, while he found valuable for study.
When Luther produced his own translation of the Bible in 1534, broke the scriptures of the Old Testament that were not found in the Hebrew Bible in a separate section titled "Apocrypha." Luther did not omit any of these scriptures from any of the editions of the Bible. However, * * was the first to separate them, and * not * indicate that the Scriptures (and with others) were not inspired.
Fast forward to the 1560s. At that time, Protestantism was in full swing. The majority - nearly all - of Luther's Protestant Bible followed the practice of separating the Scriptures of the Apocrypha in a separate section. The English added 3 Scriptures Luther never included in the Bible.
According to the HarperCollins Dictionary of the Bible, the Puritans were the first group - in any language - to produce the Bible without the Apocrypha. This was done in the 1590s. This practice caught later with other Protestant sects (but not all) and other languages.
In response, a law was passed in England making it a crime to produce a Bible without the Apocrypha. Will be difficult to find an English Bible without the English Protestant Apocrypha complete before the year 1700.
Eventually, however, most of the English Puritan Protestant sects followed suit. Significantly, the numerous Anglican Communion still uses the Apocrypha in religious services.
Here is more infohttp: / / http://www.bible-reviews.com/charts_scri …
Jim
Each religion has its own books in which recognition is considered sacred / important that the lessons will be included in the Bible.
so depending on the church belongs to the organization, in theory, the book in the Bible is different according to each belief.
I think the reference as mentioned in Wikipedia is welcome.
Why the Apocrypha is not in the Bible.
1. Not one of the apocryphal books is written in the Hebrew language, which was used only by the inspired historians and poets of the Old Testament. All books are in Greek apocryphal, but one which is extant only in Latin.
2. None of the apocryphal writers claimed inspiration.
3. The apocryphal books were never recognized as Scripture by the Jews, custodians of the Hebrew Scriptures (the Apocrypha was written before the New Testament). In fact, the Jewish people rejected and destroyed after the Apocrypha overthow of Jerusalem in 70 AD
4. The apocryphal books are not permitted among the sacred books during the first four centuries of the true Christian church (I'm certainly not talking about the Catholic religion is not Christian).
5. The Apocrypha contains fabulous statements which not only contradict the "canonical" scriptures but themselves. For example, in the two Books of Maccabees, Antiochus Epiphane is to die three deaths in three different places.
6. The Apocrypha includes doctrines in variance with the Bible, such as prayers for the dead and sinless perfection. The following verses are taken from the Apocrypha translation by Ronald Knox, 1954:
BASIS FOR THE DOCTRINE OF Purgatory:
2 Maccabees 12:43-45, 2000 pieces of silver were sent to Jerusalem for a sin-offering … As he made reconciliation for the dead, which could be delivered from sin.
SALVATION BY WORKS:
Ecclesiasticus 3:30, Water cooling a flame of fire, and alms makes atonement for sin.
Tobit 12:8-9, 17, is better to give alms than to lay golden Is to offer alms to death, and purge away all sin.
MAGIC:
Tobit 6:5-8, where the devil or an evil spirit trouble to anyone, may be expelled by a smokescreen of the heart, liver and gall of a fish … smells and the devil is, and flee away, come again and never again.
María was born without sin (Immaculate Conception):
Wisdom 8:19-20, I was a witty child and had received a good soul. And I was rather, I came to a body undefiled.
7. It teaches immoral practices, such as lying, suicide, murder and magic spell.
8. Apocryphal book is not mentioned in the New Testament that the Old Testament refers to hundreds of times.
9. Due to these and other reasons, the apocryphal books are only valuable as ancient documents illustrative of the ways, language, opinions and history of the East.
It was not the Apocrypha in the King James?
The King James translators never considered the Apocrypha the word of God. Some books of historical value, the Apocrypha was sandwiched between the Old and New Testament as an appendix of reference material. This followed the format that Luther had used. Luther made a statement with the Apocrypha:
"Apocrypha - that is, books that are not considered equal to the saints Scriputres, yet they are profitable and good to read."
King James Version Defended p. 98.
In 1599, twelve years before the King James Bible was published, King James said this about the Apocrypha:
"As for the Apocriphe book, because I'm not omit Catholic (as I said before )…"
King James Charles Stewart Basilicon ~ Doron, page 13
————
The above is taken in its entirety below the website
Blessed be
Because there was no agreement that they were part of the original scriptures, ie a lot of "man made" rules in Catholicism, thus dividing the beliefs of Christians and Catholics. Christians believe in the Father Son and Holy Spirit - as a Trinity. Catholics have added the rules and religion.
Since Luther decided that since the codification of the Pharisees in their canon Jamnia, some 200 years after Christ, which was to go with your version. The Septuagint Scripture is Christ and the apostles used, but reformers rejected it. Pax Christi
Maccabees teach prayer for the dead (in fact killing them) and the intercession of the martyred saints (Onias and Jeremiah), which are against the teaching of Protestant dogma
Therefore, the Pharisee Palestinain Masoretic OT Canon was elected during the Alexandrian Greek LXXX a Judeo-Christian
You will need to examine history. The biblical canon was established end of the century, 3 / 4 of the early twentieth century.
Why the books were removed after this establishment, is anyone's guess. Time to do some research of my friend.
are absent from all the Protestant Bibles, but Protestants do not use for academic purposes, as they are not in the Jewish canon, and because it is against the Protestant doctrine.
Missing books are not associated with any agency of the Hebrew Scriptures. This is why the care of Protestants, Catholics, while ruling the world.
Because of the different religions rewrote the Bible to its interpretation.
.
Because the Protestant Bibles today are incomplete.
Because books like Maccabees wondered beliefs.
The answer directly above the mine is correct. Luther chopped out.
Would not suit so it did. Just read the Book of Wisdom and you will understand why.
Protestant saving ink and paper
We heard nothing headed stupid ignorant people