Comments on: Why are the books that are in the Catholic Bible that are missing from the Protestant Bible?

By: http://w

http://w — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 03:39:29 +0000

Each religion has its own books in which recognition is considered sacred / important that the lessons will be included in the Bible.
so depending on the church belongs to the organization, in theory, the book in the Bible is different according to each belief.
I think the reference as mentioned in Wikipedia is welcome.

By: Nobody

Nobody — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 03:39:29 +0000

Why the Apocrypha is not in the Bible.
1. Not one of the apocryphal books is written in the Hebrew language, which was used only by the inspired historians and poets of the Old Testament. All books are in Greek apocryphal, but one which is extant only in Latin.
2. None of the apocryphal writers claimed inspiration.
3. The apocryphal books were never recognized as Scripture by the Jews, custodians of the Hebrew Scriptures (the Apocrypha was written before the New Testament). In fact, the Jewish people rejected and destroyed after the Apocrypha overthow of Jerusalem in 70 AD
4. The apocryphal books are not permitted among the sacred books during the first four centuries of the true Christian church (I'm certainly not talking about the Catholic religion is not Christian).
5. The Apocrypha contains fabulous statements which not only contradict the "canonical" scriptures but themselves. For example, in the two Books of Maccabees, Antiochus Epiphane is to die three deaths in three different places.
6. The Apocrypha includes doctrines in variance with the Bible, such as prayers for the dead and sinless perfection. The following verses are taken from the Apocrypha translation by Ronald Knox, 1954:
BASIS FOR THE DOCTRINE OF Purgatory:
2 Maccabees 12:43-45, 2000 pieces of silver were sent to Jerusalem for a sin-offering … As he made reconciliation for the dead, which could be delivered from sin.
SALVATION BY WORKS:
Ecclesiasticus 3:30, Water cooling a flame of fire, and alms makes atonement for sin.
Tobit 12:8-9, 17, is better to give alms than to lay golden Is to offer alms to death, and purge away all sin.
MAGIC:
Tobit 6:5-8, where the devil or an evil spirit trouble to anyone, may be expelled by a smokescreen of the heart, liver and gall of a fish … smells and the devil is, and flee away, come again and never again.
María was born without sin (Immaculate Conception):
Wisdom 8:19-20, I was a witty child and had received a good soul. And I was rather, I came to a body undefiled.
7. It teaches immoral practices, such as lying, suicide, murder and magic spell.
8. Apocryphal book is not mentioned in the New Testament that the Old Testament refers to hundreds of times.
9. Due to these and other reasons, the apocryphal books are only valuable as ancient documents illustrative of the ways, language, opinions and history of the East.
It was not the Apocrypha in the King James?
The King James translators never considered the Apocrypha the word of God. Some books of historical value, the Apocrypha was sandwiched between the Old and New Testament as an appendix of reference material. This followed the format that Luther had used. Luther made a statement with the Apocrypha:
"Apocrypha - that is, books that are not considered equal to the saints Scriputres, yet they are profitable and good to read."
King James Version Defended p. 98.
In 1599, twelve years before the King James Bible was published, King James said this about the Apocrypha:
"As for the Apocriphe book, because I'm not omit Catholic (as I said before )…"
King James Charles Stewart Basilicon ~ Doron, page 13
————
The above is taken in its entirety below the website
Blessed be

By: cmhelp1

cmhelp1 — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 03:39:29 +0000

Because there was no agreement that they were part of the original scriptures, ie a lot of "man made" rules in Catholicism, thus dividing the beliefs of Christians and Catholics. Christians believe in the Father Son and Holy Spirit - as a Trinity. Catholics have added the rules and religion.

By: BoxFace

BoxFace — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 03:39:29 +0000

Since Luther decided that since the codification of the Pharisees in their canon Jamnia, some 200 years after Christ, which was to go with your version. The Septuagint Scripture is Christ and the apostles used, but reformers rejected it. Pax Christi

By: Roman C

Roman C — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 03:39:29 +0000

Maccabees teach prayer for the dead (in fact killing them) and the intercession of the martyred saints (Onias and Jeremiah), which are against the teaching of Protestant dogma
Therefore, the Pharisee Palestinain Masoretic OT Canon was elected during the Alexandrian Greek LXXX a Judeo-Christian

By: James O

James O — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 03:39:29 +0000

You will need to examine history. The biblical canon was established end of the century, 3 / 4 of the early twentieth century.
Why the books were removed after this establishment, is anyone's guess. Time to do some research of my friend.

By: Fr Alexander

Fr Alexander — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 03:39:29 +0000

are absent from all the Protestant Bibles, but Protestants do not use for academic purposes, as they are not in the Jewish canon, and because it is against the Protestant doctrine.

By: stacy

stacy — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 03:39:29 +0000

Missing books are not associated with any agency of the Hebrew Scriptures. This is why the care of Protestants, Catholics, while ruling the world.

By: Wideboy Slim

Wideboy Slim — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 03:39:29 +0000

Because of the different religions rewrote the Bible to its interpretation.
.

By: Tag23

Tag23 — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 03:39:29 +0000

Because the Protestant Bibles today are incomplete.