If Protestants are going to quote the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Protestant beliefs can be found?
The Protestant has a reason honestly. He sees the heresy and contradiction in the CCC. It refers to Article 868, for it is a truth.
Paragraph 819, the Protestant know, is something he knows Novus Ordo Catholics should not believe but there it is, with all the glory of his apostolic. He knows that it must be true, and it is against their new doctrine of Vatican II, but there it is.
The Protestant remembers when Catholics respect Pope Pius XII. And all the popes before him. It is not thought, but nobody knows that people call uncatholic. And today? Did not even know the popes before Vatican II?
The Protestant does the CCC, which contradicts itself. Claims to the contrary in Par. 868, which is its new doctrine, a false ecumenism and religious freedom, he, Protestant, must be true, and this is contrary to the doctrine of Christ in Par. 819. The Protestant doctrine known to be found in any textbook of apologetics, the kind of book CCC these people never dare to collect and read. He has studied Fathers, and he knows it. The doctrine of Christ puts a curse on false ecumenism and religious freedom.
It is a credit Protestants can point to the true doctrine, which for him is heresy, but for the true church is not. The protesters called the Doctrine of the Catholic Church and he is obviously smarter than the Novus Ordo who are reading the words in Article 819 and not understand them.
The protesters say the potatoes can become heretics. Catholic doctrine agrees. Is the Novus Ordo Vatican II who deny it. No one argues that a pope can not become a heretic. In fact, the canons of the Church provide the punishment for the Pope in case it happens to commit heresy. Because he is removed from office, and the President is vacant. Sede Vacante, the empty chair. This has happened five times since 1958. There has been no legitimate popes since Pope Pius XII a saint pope. Is there anything in the Bible that we can say how many more of these impostors who have to endure before we all pushed out? The Protestants, is likely to have the vision to know. Can you say?
Protestants! Help these Novus Ordo to return to Catholicism. As it is, that even as Protestants do. They are Roman Protestants, with a mixture of any doctrine.
There is no salvation outside the Church. This is an article of faith established by previous popes of the past that the church already heretical Novus Ordo does not comply. Paragraph 819 is a perfect example of the heresy of the pope who wrote the encyclical on "Ecumenism" and "religious freedom", as heresy against the true Church. Many Catholics are still living, raising children to become true Catholics, at a time when there is no present Vicar of Christ.
Catholics who belong to the Catholic Church of Pope Pius XII. Do any of you dare to call a Catholic? The underground church is in private chapels around the world, not SSPX anagrams or otherwise, but for each valid priests had nothing to do with the heresy of Vatican II and the heretical church that generated .
If anyone wants to know the actual Catechism of the Church, says that Protestants KNOW what they are supposed to say, and is what Catholics believe, is the Catechism of Trent, or the Third Plenary Council of Baltimore, Baltimore Catechism. The Second Vatican Council will have nothing to do with THESE catechisms.
- The Catholic Church will always be How to Restore Tradition Back The Church was before Vatican II?
- See how the Catholic Church teaches about hell and now I never purgatory?
- Is not It Funny That Kinda reconcile Protestants is the Catholic Church with respect, though …?
- When tradition is to be restored back to the Church of Christ, the Catholic Church?
- What is the difference between Eastern Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant and beliefs?
My wife and I belong to Pius X. We do not subscribe to the Novus Ordo.
We used the Catechism of Trent. The Mass has been changed in the words of consecration have been changed: Special est enim corpus meum. This is my body. In the consecration of the Blood: This is the Challis of my blood which is shed for many pro multis. A: which is shed for all men Pro Omnibus. Pardon my Latin, I have not used it in years.
Is there a valid question here, or just a rant Againt reconcile Novos Ordo of the Church?
Hmmm,
Looooong diatribe seems to me with at least one obvious defect vary.
You refer to "Protestants" as all are a group of like-minded and theological doctrines.
In fact, there are over 30,000 Protestant sects (and counting) Did you survey them all and find them all according to their position?
I doubt it.
Therefore, fix the defect and then get back to us in the rest.
Peace and God bless!
This sounds like the chirping of a loser. The Second Vatican Council was convened by a Pope, duly elected, seated, and its decisions are binding on the Roman Catholic Church. The dissenters who refuse to recognize the decisons excommunicate themselves. Order to condemn the Protestants Catholics to recognize the Catholic doctrine that says that Protestantism may have "many elements of sanctification and truth" is somewhat contradictory. I do not see anyone buying into his diatribe.
The Protestant religion is terrible. and should be banned Dis
In Ireland have the death squads of unionists.
in the U.S. is the Ku Klux Klan
Protestant leaders are all a thief and are only in it for the money.
Read the book of the law cannon!
become a true Catholic.
Catholic Pharisees =
Titus 1:15-16 (New International Version)
15th is pure, whatever is pure, but for those who are polluted and unbelieving, nothing is pure, but his mind and conscience are defiled.
16They know God, but by their deeds they deny Him, being abominable and disobedient and worthless for any good deed.
Isaiah 29:13-16 (New International Version)
13Then the Lord said:
"Because this people draw near with their words
And honor me with their lip service,
But remove their hearts far from me
And their reverence for Me consists of tradition learned by rote,
14Therefore behold, once again deal marvelously with this people, wonderfully beautiful;
And the wisdom of their wise men shall perish,
And the discernment of their discerning men shall be hidden. "
15Woe deep to hide their plans to the Lord,
And whose acts are performed in a dark place
They say: "Who sees us?" Or "Who knows us?"
16You make a difference!
Will the potter be considered as equal with the clay,
What he did say that its creator, "He did not make me";
Or what is formed say it formed, "He has no understanding"?
How will the non-Christian I always learn something about Jesus Christ and the power of God for salvation when doctrine lot doctrine, the controversy in dispute until there is nothing more than confusion and tour the world without a church that is new to the mess we've made?
You forgot the gates of hell shall not prevail against the church and that includes after Pius XII. Why not relieved of the burden and let Peter be the leader? It wieght too. Seriously, throw a little and you loose the whole thing. The church does not make sense otherwise. Trent does not contradict anything in Vatican II. But the burden to himself whether he should be the scholar to unravel all the details that only apparently contradictory. Back.