The non-Catholic Christians … What Do You Think?
… on the fifth Marian dogma?
"… The Virgin Mary [is] the spiritual Mother of all peoples, the Co-Redeemer, who under and with her Son cooperated in the redemption of all people, the Mediatrix of all graces, who as Mother brings us the gift of life eternal, and the prosecutor, who presents our prayers to her Son. "
Did you realize that …
Mary is supposedly the spiritual mother of all people?
She is a co-redeemer "(which means that just as Jesus saves people from sin)?
She brings ????!!!!! eternal life
We present our prayers to his son?
Ha, ha, ha, and HA!
Did you know that even though Mary gave birth to Jesus first, and later other children he had with Joseph (James is one of them), which Catholics believe that life is still a virgin? For the life of me, I do not understand how anyone can consider a woman who had multiple natural conceptions and born to be a "perpetual virgin".
But there is no Einstein
- Mary was a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus Christ. Why do Catholics say it is "always a virgin"
- Catholics … Do you accept that Mary remained a virgin permanent?
- Catholics Can Answer These Questions About Mary? ?
- Catholics: If the Bible does say that Mary ascended into heaven?
- Do you think the Virgin Mary is the Mother of God "?
"Believing in God is no big deal … (in response to another) the Bible tells us that even the demons believe and tremble.
Believing in Jesus for salvation is the test … No, Mary, not saints, not the dead prayingj, excluding accounts ….
But if you do what Jesus said: … in the order that da …. no action that goes along with the beliefe in Jesus …. not just "BELIEVE ….
The first step is to pray only to God in the Name of Jesus …..
The rest is there to see for yourself ….
Catholicism, the largest religion in the world.
I'm not sure you're reading carefully.
First, if Jesus is our brother, then why can not Mary his mother, called our "spiritual mother"? Why is it bad? Why do not we want both support and assistance possible to live the Christian faith?
In the co-redemptrix, which seems to have missed the part where it says, "that virtue and with his Son cooperated in the redemption of all people." That is really a fact. She is the one who brought Christ into the world. I do not know why God chose to do things that way - surely Jesus could have just conjured from nothing - but in His perfect wisdom He asked Mary to participate in the creation of Christ, and in fact did so. (If you're confused about whether Mary had a paper, please go to Luke 1.)
And the passage says that "brings the gifts of eternal life," ie, gave birth to Christ, giving birth.
Furthermore, the Bible says that she presents our prayers to her Son. Please see John 2, and you'll read about how Mary is an intercessor to Christ listening and responding positively to the grants.
Finally, the Bible says that Mary gave birth to a child who is not Jesus. There is absolutely no verse that says he had sex with Joseph, and absolutely no verse that says she gave birth to another child. You are applying a certain theory of Scripture that is unsubstantiated by the Scripture itself.
Obviously, you are not an Einstein, but it does not take a rocket scientist to consider these matters and, logically, practically. If there is no verse that says Mary gave birth to a second, third, fourth, fifth or whatever child, why did you say that?
Catholism is all about symbols. The crucifix, the Virgin Mary, the Rosary, Apostles' Creed … all are just symbols created for people may feel like they think instead of having the true faith.
Got a good thing
there is no Einstein
Is there anything else about the people who believe in a God that wants to laugh?
N Einstein, and the need for better education. There is no such thing as a Catholic Christian. Ordinary Catholics are very deceived, in dire need of help. Catholic-educated and (worse) Orthodox are vile, disgusting liars and have criminal associations, and are not even able to breathe. No, in any case confused with Christians.
.
There is NO scriptural basis for any of this crap!
First, I'm just going to look at Mary from the Catholic Encyclopedia. Since Jesus' death and resurrection in: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15464b.h …
Let's start with this:
CITA
When it comes to sin, Mary must always be the exception. [81] Mary's complete exemption from actual sin is confirmed by the Council of Trent (Session VI, Canon 23): "If anyone says that man once justified can during his whole life avoid all sins, even venial such as the Virgin Church has done through a special privilege of God, let him be accursed. " Theologians assert that Mary was impeccable, not by the essential perfection of his nature, but by a special divine privilege. Moreover, the parents, at least from the V century, almost unanimously maintain that the Blessed Virgin never experienced the motions of concupiscence.
Mary was impeccable?
I think not! Not according to what Scripture says:
Romans 3:9-11 (New International Version)
9What we will celebrate then? Are we better off [a]? Absolutely! We have already made the charge that Jews and Gentiles are all under sin. 10AS is written:
"There is none righteous, no not one;
11there is no one who understands;
no one seeks God.
How can anyone say something like this:
CITA
Moreover, the parents, at least from the V century, almost unanimously maintain that the Blessed Virgin never experienced the motions of concupiscence.
Kon-Kyoo lust-puh-Suhner (t) s; Kuhn, noun:
Strong desire, especially sexual desire, lust
Mary never had sexual desires?
It would not be human if he did not!
But we can not stop reading more into this than just sexual desis. Can anyone honestly say that it is not reffering to all sinful thoughts?
Mary would have to be perfect!
This is blasphemy of the worst kind!
It is, was and will be only one PEREFCT PERSON OF JESUS CHRIST!
Well, let's continue:
CITA
Revelation 12:1-6
In Revelation (12:1-16) occurs a passage singularly applicable to the Blessed Virgin:
And a great portent appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars, and being pregnant, wept labor pains, and was in pain to be delivered. He had seen another sign in heaven: and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns and seven crowns on their heads, and his tail drew a third of the stars of heaven and threw them to the earth, and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready for delivery, so that when she gave birth, to devour her child. She gave birth to a son who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God and His throne. And the woman fled into the desert where he had a place prepared by God, not to feed his twelve hundred sixty days.
The applicability of this passage to Mary is based on the following considerations:
At least some of the verses refer to the mother whose son was to rule all nations with a rod of iron, according to Psalm 2:9, this is the Son of God, Jesus Christ, who is the mother of Mary.
He was the son of Mary "was taken to God and His throne" at the time of his ascension to heaven.
The dragon, or the devil of the earthly paradise (cf. Revelation 12:9, 20:2), tried to devour the son of Mary from the first moments of his birth, stirring jealousy of Herod and, later, the enmities of the Jews.
Due to their unspeakable privileges, Mary can be described as "clothed with the sun and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars".
It is true that commentators generally understand the whole passage to be applied literally to the Church, and that some of the verses is better suited to the Church than to Mary. But keep in mind that Mary is both a figure of the Church and its most prominent member. What is said of the Church, is in its real way of Mary. Therefore the passage in Revelation (12:5-6) does not refer to Mary merely by way of accommodation [108], but applies it in a truly literal sense which appears to be partly limited to her, and partly widespread throughout the Church. Relationship of Mary with the Church is well summarized in the expression "collum corporis Mystici" applied to the Virgin of San Bernardino of Siena. [109]
Cardinal Newman [110] considers two difficulties against the foregoing interpretation of the vision of the woman and child: first, is said to be little support from parents, secondly, it is anachronistic to attribute that image of the Virgin in the apostolic age. Regarding the first exception, the eminent writer says:
Christians have never gone to Scripture for proof of their doctrines, and there was no real need, the pressure of the dispute, if in those times the dignity of the Blessed Virgin was unchallenged on all hands, as a matter of doctrine , Scripture, in their controversial issue was concerned, was likely to remain a closed book to them.
After developing this answer at length, the cardinal continues:
Regarding the second objection I have supposed, far from allowing it, I think that is based on a simple act of imagination, and that the truth of the matter lies in the very opposite direction. The Virgin and Child is not merely a modern idea, by contrast, is represented again and again because each visitor to Rome is aware, in the paintings of the catacombs. Mary is drawn with the Divine Child in her lap, her hands outstretched in prayer, with his hand in an attitude of blessing.
Represented in the paintings?
Is that how a person believes? With what they see in a picture?
I can not believe what this sounds absolutely ludricrous!
Also:
See what is happening here, where Catholics attributed to features, to Mary, who are here? Are being put in position of equality with Christ!
Try telling that this is not blasphemy of the worst kind!
Now, let's look at the doctine of the assumption of "Mary" http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02006b.h …
First, let's look at this:
CITA
THE FACT OF THE ASSUMPTION
As for the day, year, and the manner of death of the Virgin, we know nothing certain. The earliest known literary reference to the Assumption Greek is in the work of De Obitu S. Dominae. The Catholic faith, however, has always derived from knowledge of the mystery of the Apostolic Tradition. Epiphanius (d. 403) acknowledged that he knew nothing definite about it (Haer., LXXIX, 11). The dates assigned for this vary between three and fifteen years after the Ascension of Christ. Two cities claim to be the place of her departure: Jerusalem and Ephesus. In agreement for Jerusalem, where his tomb is shown, but some argue in favor of Ephesus. The first six centuries, was unaware of the tomb of Mary in Jerusalem.
Even the theologians do not know where she was buried!
Then we have the following:
CITA
St. Juvenal, Bishop of Jerusalem, at the Council of Chalcedon (451), released to the Emperor Marcian and Pulcheria, who wished to possess the body of the Mother of God, that Mary died in the presence of all the apostles, but his tomb , when opened, at the request of St. Thomas, was found empty, where the Apostles concluded that the body was taken to heaven.
If you do not know where he was buried Mary, how do you even know it was the grave, right? There was evidence that they exist, that the tomb had not been stolen?
Have you noticed throughout these articles, that the word "tradiion" is used a lot?
That's what the Catholic Church run by the traditions, in fact not the Bible, we have in the word of God, the Bible!
Then we have the following:
CITA
Scripture and tradition agree in ascribing to Mary the greatest personal sanctity, she is conceived without the stain of original sin ……….
Excuse me ????????????????
Concieved with the stain of original sin?
That is biblically impossible.
Mary was born of human parents! There is no way he could not have the stain of original sin!
Even King David recognized this fact:
[I] Psalm 51:5 (New International Version)
Surely I was sinful at birth,
sinful from the time my mother conceived me.
If she was conceived in sin, it would be perfect, and that is blasphemy!
There is only one person who concieved without original sin, Jesus Christ!
Now many will say that I am mocking Mary.
I'm NOT!
I an only going by what the Bible and the Bible only says, because that's the only truth we can trust!
Here are the Biblical
Facts about Mary:
1. She was a virgin-Luke 1:27
2. She was the wife of Joseph-Matthew 1:24
3. I was just with God-Luke 1:30
4. She was the mother of Jesus, Luke 1:35
Yes, Mary has to be respected.
But while she has a special place in biblical Christianity, she was a mortal woman that God used.
She is not to be worshiped, prayed to, from, in any way, be placed above any mortal person.
be more respectful of Mary, please.
the problem here is Catholicism, not her.
Why is your spiritual mother must be a virgin in order to worship?
<<"… The Virgin Mary [is] the spiritual Mother of all peoples, the Co-Redeemer, who under and with her Son cooperated in the redemption of all people, the Mediatrix of all graces, as the mother who brings the gifts of life eternal, and the prosecutor, who presents our prayers to her Son. ">>
Mary is our Mother and Queen of the New Kingdom Davidic
John 19:26 - Jesus makes Mary the Mother of us all as He dies on the cross saying: "Behold your mother." Jesus said "John, behold your mother" because he gave Mary to all of us, his beloved disciples. All words Jesus uttered on the cross was a divine purpose. Jesus was telling John to take care of his mother.
Rev. 12:17 - this verse shows the meaning of John 19:26. The Wife (Mary) descendants are those who follow Jesus. She is our Mother and we are His children in Jesus Christ. The master plan of the covenant of God's love for us is family. But we can not be a complete family with the fatherhood of God and the Brotherhood of Christ without the motherhood of Mary.
John 2:3 - This is a very signifcant verse in Scripture. Like our mother, Mary tells us all to do what Jesus says. In addition, the intercession of Mary at the wedding of Cana triggers the ministry of Jesus and a foreshadowing of the Eucharistic celebration of the Lamb. This celebration unites all believers in one Famiy through marriage of divinity and humanity.
John 2:7 - Jesus allows his mother to intercede for the people in his name, and responds to his mother's request by ordering the servants to fill the jars with water.
Psalm 45:9 - the psalmist teaches that the queen is on the right hand of God. The Queen's role is important in the kingdom of God. Mary, Queen of Heaven is at the right hand of the Son of God.
1 Kings 2:17, 20 - in the Old Testament Davidic kingdom, the king does not refuse to his mother. Jesus is the new King David, and he rejects the entreaties of his mother Mary, the Queen.
1 Kings 2:18 - in the Old Testament Davidic kingdom, the queen intercedes on behalf of the king's followers. She is the queen mother (or "Gebirah"). Mary is our eternal Gebirah.
1 Kings 2:19 - in the Old Testament Davidic kingdom King bows to his mother and she sits on his right hand. We, as children of the New Covenant, should imitate our King and pay the same tribute to Mary our Mother. As we honor Mary, we honor our King, Jesus Christ.
1 Kings 15:13 - the Queen Mother is a position of real power in the monarchy of Israel. Here the queen is removed from office. But now, the Davidic kingdom is perfected by Jesus and Mary is our Mother forever in his right hand.
2 Chron. 22:10 - here the Queen Mother Athaliah destroys the royal family of Judah after she sees her son King Ahaziah died. The mother, the Queen has an important role in the kingdom.
Neh. 2:6 - the Queen Mother sits beside the King. She is the chief advocate before the king.
<<Did You know that even though Mary gave birth first to Jesus, and later to other sons and daughters he had with Joseph (James is one of these),>>
"Brothers of Jesus" (adelphoi)) = Cousins or relatives
Luke 1:36 - Elizabeth is a relative of Mary. Some Bibles translate relative as "cousin", but this is an incorrect translation because in Hebrew and Aramaic, there is no word for "cousin".
Luke 22:32 - Jesus tells Peter to strengthen his brethren. In this case, we clearly see that Jesus' "brothers" to refer to the other apostles, not his biological siblings.
Acts 1:12-15 - the gathering of "brothers of Jesus" amounts to about 120. That's a lot of "brothers". Brother relatives means in Hebrew.
Acts 7:26, 11:1, 13:15,38, 15:3,23,32, 28:17,21 - these are some of the many other examples where "brethren" does not mean blood relations .
Rom. 9:3 - Paul uses "brethren" and "parents" interchangeably. "Brothers" of Jesus does not prove that Mary had other children.
Genesis 11:26-28 - Lot is the nephew of Abraham ( "anepsios") / Genesis 13:8, 14:14,16 - Lot is still called the brother of Abraham (adelphos "). This shows that although a Greek word cousin is "anepsios," Scripture also uses "adelphos" to describe a cousin.
Genesis 29:15 - Laban calls Jacob is "brother" even though Jacob is his nephew. Again, this shows that the brother of half-siblings or cousins.
Deut. 23:7, 1 Chronicles. 15:5-18, Jer. 34:9, Neh. 5:7 - "brethren" means relatives. Hebrew and Aramaic have no word for "cousin".
2 Sam. 1:26, 1 Kings 9:13, 20:32 - Here we see that "brethren" can even be one that is unrelated (no line of blood), as a friend.
2 Kings 10:13-14 - 42 Ahaziah of "brothers" were actually their relatives.
1 Chronicles. 23:21-22 - Eleazar's daughters married their "brethren" who were actually his cousins.
Neh. 4:14; 5:1,5,8,10,14 - these are more examples of "brothers" which means "cousins" or "relatives".
Tobit 5:11 - Azarias Tobias asks you to identify yourself and your people, but still calls him "brother."
Amos 1: 9 - brotherhood can also mean an ally (when no bloodline).
Misunderstanding about Matthew 1:25 (Joseph knew her "not to")
Matt. 1:25 - this verse says Joseph knew "until you (" theos "in Greek)" she bore a son. Some Protestants argue that this shows Joseph had relations with Mary after she bore a son. This is a misreading of the text because no "to" no means no … until later. " "Heos" refers to the past, never the future. Instead, "not until" she bore a son means "not to the point that" she had a son. This confirms that Mary was a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus. Here are other texts that show that no "until" means "not to the extent that":
Matt. 28:29 - I am with you "to the end of the world. This does not mean that Jesus is not with us after the end of the world.
Luke 1:80 - John was in the desert "to the point of his manifestation to Israel." Not John "was in the desert until after" his manifestation.
Luke 2:37 - Anna was a widow "to the point that" he was eighty-four. She was a widow after eighty-four.
Luke 20:43 - Jesus says, "sit beside me until I have made your enemies your footstool." Jesus will not require the apostles sitting on his left hand after their enemies are their footstool.
1 Tim. 4:13 - "to the point where I come," attend to teaching and preaching. This does not mean doing nothing "until after" I come.
Genesis 8:7 - the raven flew back and forth "to the point that" [until] the waters dried from the earth. The raven did not start flying after the waters dried.
Genesis 28:15 - the Lord will not leave Jacob "up to the point that" what makes her promise. This does not mean that the Lord will leave Jacob afterward.
Deut. 34:6 - but "to the point today," nobody knows the burial place of Moses. This does not mean that "could not take place until today."
2 Sam. 6:23 - Micah daughter of Saul had no children "to the point" [until] her death. She was not with the child after his death.
1 Mac 5:54 - no one was killed "to the point that" they became in peace. They were killed after they returned in peace.
<<that Catholics believe it is still a perpetual virgin?>>
Ever Virgin Mary is
Exodus 13:2,12 - Jesus is sometimes referred to as the "first born" son of Mary. However, "firstborn" is a common Jewish expression that is the first child to open the womb. Nothing to see the mother with her future children.
Exodus 34:20 - under the law of Moses, the "first born" son had to be sanctified. "Firstborn" state does not require a "second" born.
Ez. 44:2 - Ezekiel prophesies that no man shall pass through the door that the Lord came into the world. This is a prophecy of the perpetual virginity of Mary. Mary remained a virgin before, during and after the birth of Jesus.
Mark 6:3 - Jesus was always known as the "son of Mary," not a "son of Mary. Also "brothers" in theory could have been children of Joseph by a previous marriage was dissolved by death. However, it is likely, perhaps more likely, that Joseph was a virgin, as were Jesus and Mary. As such, it embodies the true Holy family, totally devoted to God.
Luke 1:31,34 - the angel tells Mary that "is" to conceive (using the future tense). Replied Mary saying, "How can this be?" Mary's reply shows that she had taken a vow of perpetual virginity by not having the intention of having sex with a man. If Mary did not have a vow of perpetual virginity, her question would make no sense at all (for which we can assume that she knew how to conceive a child). She was a consecrated virgin as a temple was an accepted custom of the times.
Luke 2:41-51 - in search of Jesus and seek the Lord in the temple, there is never any mention of other siblings.
John 7:3-4, Mark 3:21 - we see that the more "brothers" were advising Jesus. But this would have been extremely disrespectful to the devout Jews if they were biological siblings of Jesus.
John 19:26-27 - Jesus would have been unthinkable to commit the care of her mother a friend if they had siblings.
John 19:25 - The following verses show that James and Joseph were cousins of Jesus and not
You should bring this issue up in his tent next Revival - before speaking in tongues, of course (but after handling a snake)
They are deceived! Jesus no longer needs a mother! Jesus is God!
Well, have to accept that not Einstein nor a biblical scholar, I might add.
Let's look at their claims. Obviously I said yes to give to God, so that cooperated in the redemption of mankind. Without their cooperation in the world would not have the saving grace of Jesus, where life is eternal. Moreover, as a member of the Church Triumphant and the communion of saints who hears and presents our prayers to God. All this is consistent with the teaching of Scripture and the Church of Christ.
The blessed mother NEVER had other children besides Jesus. He had no brothers. The verses that some ignorant Protestants used to say that Jesus had brothers are misunderstood. Currently, the reference in these verses was to relatives and brothers and sister not only had a word meaning brother or cousin. We know from the sacred tradition that Jesus had no brothers. Surely, if any, his lineage is known today, so that these descendants of the family of Jesus. There are none. Note that on the cross Jesus gave the care of his mother to San Juan. If he had siblings or if James was in fact his brother would have taken care to the next oldest son of the twenty-first century culture. So it really was a virgin forever with no contradiction in Scripture.
A little more study and perhaps can become an Einstein and less embarrassing to ask questions yourself. God bless.
In Christ
Fr Joseph
TITLE: WORSHIP Mary - The sin of superstition
Subtitle: A former Catholic worship demonstrates why Mary is disastrous!
Yet for all these things, if a Christian is faced with a Catholic worship of Mary, the answer is always the same: "I adore her! We just give honor due to him as the Mother of God. "However, is this true? Catholicism practiced for 30 years and I can from experience tell you that we pray to her, through her, for her and she as taught by the Roman hierarchy.
The next song, "Daily, Daily Sing to Mary" that I learned in 2nd grade. He was one of my favorites, and as a child, she sang with all my heart.
"Daily, daily sing to Mary Sing, my soul, praise;
All her feasts, her actions worship, with true heart's devotion.
She is able to deliver, Call her, trust her love;
When the storm rages around you, it calms the troubled sea.
Gifts of heaven has given you, noble madam, to our race;
She the Queen who decks her subject with the light of God's grace. "(Baltimore Catechism, No. 1, 63)
If Catholics do not worship Mary, then why say the line three to the worship of her? Note that in Rev.19: 10, said: "I fell at his feet to worship [the angel of God], and he said: Look, do not do: I am your co-worker, and thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus: worship God: "http://www.cuttingedge.org/articles/RC12 …
Also, here's proof of a Catholic nun in a CNN documentary that says very clearly and simply that the whole reason to idolize Mary comes directly from the pagan goddesses and was transferred to the Christian faith as the BISHOPS.http : / / http://www.youtube. com / watch? v = IiC03-TU5 …
I wonder if these two sources of information will be considered anti-Catholic propaganda? And one of them is not even a former Catholic (the nun), but the other had 30 years of Catholicism under his belt.
As an atheist, I can not understand how he had the first birth of a virgin.
It's funny that you pick on the faith that gave birth to her own.
I really do not understand where they get / got all rediculious biblical beliefs.
It's really sad that no matter how religious, Catholics do not go to heaven unless they trust in Jesus Christ as their personal savior
… and look at Mary … : (
Mary as Co-Redeemer has never been a dogma of the Church. Please cite your sources. Most of your comments are lies.
Catholicism is the largest religion in the world. They are idolaters and therefore defend nonbelievers.
Rome calls Mary the "Queen of Heaven." This is the title exactly the same attention to the pagan goddess of antiquity.
Did Jesus forbid repetitive prayer using a string?
"And when you pray, do not use meaningless repetition as the Gentiles, because I suppose they will be heard for their many words. Matthew 6:7
The Roman Catholics are taught the virgin Mary never had sex after the birth of Jesus and that Jesus had no brothers and sisters. The Pope teaches that Mary is the mediator between God and man. Catholics also participate in more than praise Mary, that Jesus Christ himself and actually pray for their answered prayers. Rosario graphically how Roman Catholics pile 10 times more praise to Mary than God himself. Of the 59 total counts of the Rosary, 53 beads are "Hail Marys", but only 6 beads are "Our Father". The Rosary most often ends with a "Hail Holy Queen prayer to Mary, not God.
Did Jesus have brothers and sisters in the womb of Mary?
Is not this the carpenter's son? Is not his mother called Mary and his brothers James, Joses, Simon and Judas? And his sisters are they not all with us? Whence then hath this man all these things? "Matthew 13:55-56
You can not simply be cousins because Colossians 4:10 uses a separate Greek word. John 1:41 uses the same term of Peter and his brother.
Because these verses clearly contradict Catholic doctrine, Catholic interpreters insist these are first cousins, relatives, or a supposed earlier marriage of Joseph. Of course, the Bible shows that all these things wrong. The Catechism gives this explanation ridiculous and incorrect:
"The Church has always understood these passages as not referring to other children of the Virgin Mary. In fact James and Joseph, "brothers of Jesus are the sons of another Mary, a disciple of Christ …"
Joseph did start normal sexual relations with his wife after the birth of Jesus?
"And Joseph awoke from sleep, did as the angel of the Lord commanded him and took Mary as his wife, but remained a virgin until she gave birth to a son, and called his name Jesus." Matthew 1:24-25
The Bible says there is one mediator between God and man. Is Mary a Mediator?
"For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, Christ Jesus." 1 Timothy 2:5
Catholics participate in the endless praise of Mary. When a woman praised the mother of Jesus' face, Jesus told this woman to congratulate encourage further praising Mary?
"While Jesus was saying these things, one of the women in the crowd raised her voice and said:" Blessed is the womb that bore you and the breasts at which he grew up. "But he said:" Rather, blessed are those who hear the word of God and observe. "Luke 11:27-28
Call Mary "redemptrix" puts it on par with Jesus Christ, the Divine Son of God, making it something like a fourth person of the Trinity, a quasi-goddess goddess or divine, which is blasphemy for any real Christian
When the label of Mary or any of its leaders as a saint and then others say they pray for us, this is blasphemy against God.
For the Word says that the only way the Father is through Christ. Christ is the one who took the sin and death and won. Christ said that is the end, the ultimate sacrifice.
When I was talking to a Catholic woman several years ago and the subject of Mary came. I told him that if Mary had no sin, then she God. She said no, that is not God. I asked her, was Mary from a man and a woman?
Said yes. Then I told her, Mary is thus the flesh, born of sin and need a Savior.
A matter of much theological debate for centuries.
Please stop giving false testimony against Catholicism. That's not a dogma. A small group of people who have been pushing for that, but it has not happened.
First, I'm not sure where it comes from this dogma, but not from the Bible. Therefore, I take very seriously this writing.
Mary could have been a virgin at the birth of Christ, but since the other siblings were conceived in the same way, I doubt she was a virgin after the birth of Jesus.
I do not quite understand. As I see it goes directly against the command of the 2nd.
I can only agree with one thing: "But there is no Einstein"
You're trying to incite hatred and problems. Catholics, said long before that one. You're nothing but a problem Damm-maker.
Do you have a question or make a statement of your opinion? It seems that the latter, therefore, violates his post question and answer format of Yahoo Answers.
For your information, see the Guide to Community. I also found the FF in the blog of Yahoo Answers.
"When it is not a question?
If you slap a question mark at the end of a sentence, does that make it a question? Oooooh, sorry, no. Alex Trebek could accept the danger, but according to the Yahoo! Answers Community Guidelines, which must follow the format of a question. So, "Kitty stopped using her cat box?" It's more a statement than a question (not to mention a potentially messy problem). Your haste in finding a solution is understandable, but what we're looking for here is something like: "How can I get my cat to use the new brand of cat litter I bought for my allergies?" That will responds better manage the situation right up front. And it is likely to go faster, more relevant answers.
We all promptly if it is a legitimate question, and fills us with details, but when we just saw, "Help !!!!?" - Damn! Is it really necessary to point out problems with this? 'Nuff said.
Another no-no is a rant or flame-starter disguised as a question. This is especially annoying in Politics and Religion categories. I will give some examples here (I'll just get ugly and end in tears), but everyone knows what I mean. These questions are for the state a viewpoint or stir the pot - the asker does not really want an answer, only a forum.
Just trying to help.
—–
Here is my copy and paste the answer to your 'question'.
Catholics do not "have" Mary intercede for us. We can and do pray directly to God. However, we also recognize that having someone to the prayer of intercession for us is very beneficial. Few people are uncomfortable to ask your friend or neighbor to pray for them, especially in times of need, after all, two sentences are better than one. Mary is and always will be, the mother of Jesus. As a mother, she has certain rights and privileges and so we ask you to intercede for us. Each prayer to Mary is actually a prayer to ask a favor of God.
I hate liars. And it is absolutely correct, as you said yourself that you are not Einstein. If you are going to slam Christianity (Catholic) at least know enough about it to not look so ignorant. Obviously you do not know much about the culture of the Bible at the time of its writing, much about the Catholic faith, right? I studied the teachings of Christianity and Catholicism, and I've never seen anywhere in any Catholic doctrine that Mary is a what? Co-Redeemer? "She brings eternal life?
I know people out there are dogging you. But I have to say this. While Mary is a very special woman, gorgeous, wonderful, which is exactly what it is: a woman. And while she was the mother of birth "of Jesus, the one, and I repeat only way to get to heaven is believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God who loves you and died on the cross for you. Accept in his heart and hand him his life. Jesus loves you.
In the first instant of her conception, by a singular privilege and grace granted by God, in view of the merits of Jesus Christ, Savior of mankind, was preserved exempt from all stain of original sin. "
The formal active essence of original sin was not removed from his soul, and withdrawing from others by baptism;
was excluded,
never was in his soul.
Simultaneously with the exclusion of sin. The state of original sanctity, innocence and justice, rather than original sin, was conferred on her, why don each spot and miss, we excluded all depraved emotions, passions and weaknesses, mainly related to original sin.
But she was not exempt from the temporal penalties of Adam - from sorrow, bodily infirmities and death.
The person of Mary, because of its origin from Adam, who have been sin, but, as the new Eve who was to be the mother of Adam, who was on the eternal plan of God and the merits Christ, withdrawn from the general law of original sin. Her redemption was the masterpiece of Christ's redeeming wisdom.
This is the meaning of the term "Immaculate Conception".
Genesis 3:15
Luke 1:28
no, no, no and no