<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The non-Catholic Christians &#8230; What Do You Think?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/</link>
	<description>Books, Magazines, and Audio, and Video Resources for Catholics</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 05:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Meg M</title>
		<link>http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-46202</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/#comment-46202</guid>
		<description>Please stop giving false testimony against Catholicism. That&#39;s not a dogma. A small group of people who have been pushing for that, but it has not happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please stop giving false testimony against Catholicism. That&#39;s not a dogma. A small group of people who have been pushing for that, but it has not happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Searcher's Curious Account</title>
		<link>http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-46203</link>
		<dc:creator>Searcher's Curious Account</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/#comment-46203</guid>
		<description>First, I&#39;m not sure where it comes from this dogma, but not from the Bible. Therefore, I take very seriously this writing.   Mary could have been a virgin at the birth of Christ, but since the other siblings were conceived in the same way, I doubt she was a virgin after the birth of Jesus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I&#39;m not sure where it comes from this dogma, but not from the Bible. Therefore, I take very seriously this writing.<br />
  Mary could have been a virgin at the birth of Christ, but since the other siblings were conceived in the same way, I doubt she was a virgin after the birth of Jesus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayf   NSF</title>
		<link>http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-46204</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayf   NSF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/#comment-46204</guid>
		<description>I do not quite understand. As I see it goes directly against the command of the 2nd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not quite understand. As I see it goes directly against the command of the 2nd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrgLvWsd</title>
		<link>http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-46205</link>
		<dc:creator>MrgLvWsd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/#comment-46205</guid>
		<description>I can only agree with one thing: &#34;But there is no Einstein&#34;   You&#39;re trying to incite hatred and problems. Catholics, said long before that one. You&#39;re nothing but a problem Damm-maker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only agree with one thing: &quot;But there is no Einstein&quot;<br />
  You&#39;re trying to incite hatred and problems. Catholics, said long before that one. You&#39;re nothing but a problem Damm-maker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Boniface Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-46206</link>
		<dc:creator>St. Boniface Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/#comment-46206</guid>
		<description>Do you have a question or make a statement of your opinion? It seems that the latter, therefore, violates his post question and answer format of Yahoo Answers.   For your information, see the Guide to Community. I also found the FF in the blog of Yahoo Answers.   &#34;When it is not a question?   If you slap a question mark at the end of a sentence, does that make it a question? Oooooh, sorry, no. Alex Trebek could accept the danger, but according to the Yahoo! Answers Community Guidelines, which must follow the format of a question. So, &#34;Kitty stopped using her cat box?&#34; It&#39;s more a statement than a question (not to mention a potentially messy problem). Your haste in finding a solution is understandable, but what we&#39;re looking for here is something like: &#34;How can I get my cat to use the new brand of cat litter I bought for my allergies?&#34; That will responds better manage the situation right up front. And it is likely to go faster, more relevant answers.   We all promptly if it is a legitimate question, and fills us with details, but when we just saw, &#34;Help !!!!?&#34; - Damn! Is it really necessary to point out problems with this? &#39;Nuff said.   Another no-no is a rant or flame-starter disguised as a question. This is especially annoying in Politics and Religion categories. I will give some examples here (I&#39;ll just get ugly and end in tears), but everyone knows what I mean. These questions are for the state a viewpoint or stir the pot - the asker does not really want an answer, only a forum.   Just trying to help.   -----   Here is my copy and paste the answer to your &#39;question&#39;.   Catholics do not &#34;have&#34; Mary intercede for us. We can and do pray directly to God. However, we also recognize that having someone to the prayer of intercession for us is very beneficial. Few people are uncomfortable to ask your friend or neighbor to pray for them, especially in times of need, after all, two sentences are better than one. Mary is and always will be, the mother of Jesus. As a mother, she has certain rights and privileges and so we ask you to intercede for us. Each prayer to Mary is actually a prayer to ask a favor of God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have a question or make a statement of your opinion? It seems that the latter, therefore, violates his post question and answer format of Yahoo Answers.<br />
  For your information, see the Guide to Community. I also found the FF in the blog of Yahoo Answers.<br />
  &quot;When it is not a question?<br />
  If you slap a question mark at the end of a sentence, does that make it a question? Oooooh, sorry, no. Alex Trebek could accept the danger, but according to the Yahoo! Answers Community Guidelines, which must follow the format of a question. So, &quot;Kitty stopped using her cat box?&quot; It&#39;s more a statement than a question (not to mention a potentially messy problem). Your haste in finding a solution is understandable, but what we&#39;re looking for here is something like: &quot;How can I get my cat to use the new brand of cat litter I bought for my allergies?&quot; That will responds better manage the situation right up front. And it is likely to go faster, more relevant answers.<br />
  We all promptly if it is a legitimate question, and fills us with details, but when we just saw, &quot;Help !!!!?&quot; - Damn! Is it really necessary to point out problems with this? &#39;Nuff said.<br />
  Another no-no is a rant or flame-starter disguised as a question. This is especially annoying in Politics and Religion categories. I will give some examples here (I&#39;ll just get ugly and end in tears), but everyone knows what I mean. These questions are for the state a viewpoint or stir the pot - the asker does not really want an answer, only a forum.<br />
  Just trying to help.<br />
  &#8212;&#8211;<br />
  Here is my copy and paste the answer to your &#39;question&#39;.<br />
  Catholics do not &quot;have&quot; Mary intercede for us. We can and do pray directly to God. However, we also recognize that having someone to the prayer of intercession for us is very beneficial. Few people are uncomfortable to ask your friend or neighbor to pray for them, especially in times of need, after all, two sentences are better than one. Mary is and always will be, the mother of Jesus. As a mother, she has certain rights and privileges and so we ask you to intercede for us. Each prayer to Mary is actually a prayer to ask a favor of God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: be nice</title>
		<link>http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-46207</link>
		<dc:creator>be nice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/#comment-46207</guid>
		<description>I hate liars. And it is absolutely correct, as you said yourself that you are not Einstein. If you are going to slam Christianity (Catholic) at least know enough about it to not look so ignorant. Obviously you do not know much about the culture of the Bible at the time of its writing, much about the Catholic faith, right? I studied the teachings of Christianity and Catholicism, and I&#39;ve never seen anywhere in any Catholic doctrine that Mary is a what? Co-Redeemer? &#34;She brings eternal life?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate liars. And it is absolutely correct, as you said yourself that you are not Einstein. If you are going to slam Christianity (Catholic) at least know enough about it to not look so ignorant. Obviously you do not know much about the culture of the Bible at the time of its writing, much about the Catholic faith, right? I studied the teachings of Christianity and Catholicism, and I&#39;ve never seen anywhere in any Catholic doctrine that Mary is a what? Co-Redeemer? &quot;She brings eternal life?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeych</title>
		<link>http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-46208</link>
		<dc:creator>monkeych</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/#comment-46208</guid>
		<description>I know people out there are dogging you. But I have to say this. While Mary is a very special woman, gorgeous, wonderful, which is exactly what it is: a woman. And while she was the mother of birth &#34;of Jesus, the one, and I repeat only way to get to heaven is believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God who loves you and died on the cross for you. Accept in his heart and hand him his life. Jesus loves you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know people out there are dogging you. But I have to say this. While Mary is a very special woman, gorgeous, wonderful, which is exactly what it is: a woman. And while she was the mother of birth &quot;of Jesus, the one, and I repeat only way to get to heaven is believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God who loves you and died on the cross for you. Accept in his heart and hand him his life. Jesus loves you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isabella</title>
		<link>http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-46209</link>
		<dc:creator>Isabella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/#comment-46209</guid>
		<description>In the first instant of her conception, by a singular privilege and grace granted by God, in view of the merits of Jesus Christ, Savior of mankind, was preserved exempt from all stain of original sin. &#34;   The formal active essence of original sin was not removed from his soul, and withdrawing from others by baptism;   was excluded,   never was in his soul.   Simultaneously with the exclusion of sin. The state of original sanctity, innocence and justice, rather than original sin, was conferred on her, why don each spot and miss, we excluded all depraved emotions, passions and weaknesses, mainly related to original sin.   But she was not exempt from the temporal penalties of Adam - from sorrow, bodily infirmities and death.   The person of Mary, because of its origin from Adam, who have been sin, but, as the new Eve who was to be the mother of Adam, who was on the eternal plan of God and the merits Christ, withdrawn from the general law of original sin. Her redemption was the masterpiece of Christ&#39;s redeeming wisdom.   This is the meaning of the term &#34;Immaculate Conception&#34;.   Genesis 3:15   Luke 1:28</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the first instant of her conception, by a singular privilege and grace granted by God, in view of the merits of Jesus Christ, Savior of mankind, was preserved exempt from all stain of original sin. &quot;<br />
  The formal active essence of original sin was not removed from his soul, and withdrawing from others by baptism;<br />
  was excluded,<br />
  never was in his soul.<br />
  Simultaneously with the exclusion of sin. The state of original sanctity, innocence and justice, rather than original sin, was conferred on her, why don each spot and miss, we excluded all depraved emotions, passions and weaknesses, mainly related to original sin.<br />
  But she was not exempt from the temporal penalties of Adam - from sorrow, bodily infirmities and death.<br />
  The person of Mary, because of its origin from Adam, who have been sin, but, as the new Eve who was to be the mother of Adam, who was on the eternal plan of God and the merits Christ, withdrawn from the general law of original sin. Her redemption was the masterpiece of Christ&#39;s redeeming wisdom.<br />
  This is the meaning of the term &quot;Immaculate Conception&quot;.<br />
  Genesis 3:15<br />
  Luke 1:28</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~~Birdy~</title>
		<link>http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-46210</link>
		<dc:creator>~~Birdy~</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/#comment-46210</guid>
		<description>no, no, no and no</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, no, no and no</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-46182</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancatholicresources.com/2009/09/the-non-catholic-christians-what-do-you-think/#comment-46182</guid>
		<description>&#34;Believing in God is no big deal ... (in response to another) the Bible tells us that even the demons believe and tremble.   Believing in Jesus for salvation is the test ... No, Mary, not saints, not the dead prayingj, excluding accounts ....   But if you do what Jesus said: ... in the order that da .... no action that goes along with the beliefe in Jesus .... not just &#34;BELIEVE ....   The first step is to pray only to God in the Name of Jesus .....   The rest is there to see for yourself ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Believing in God is no big deal &#8230; (in response to another) the Bible tells us that even the demons believe and tremble.<br />
  Believing in Jesus for salvation is the test &#8230; No, Mary, not saints, not the dead prayingj, excluding accounts &#8230;.<br />
  But if you do what Jesus said: &#8230; in the order that da &#8230;. no action that goes along with the beliefe in Jesus &#8230;. not just &quot;BELIEVE &#8230;.<br />
  The first step is to pray only to God in the Name of Jesus &#8230;..<br />
  The rest is there to see for yourself &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

