Comments on: Why are Protestants, Catholics Added thinks things the Catholic Bible?

By: PaulCyp

PaulCyp — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:13:52 +0000

Due to missing 7 books, and they know nothing about church history. They do not realize that every Bible on earth had the full 73 books to a few hundred years ago. Also do not realize that its founder, Martin Luther, fully intended for the garbage 3 books of the New Testament, along with 7 books of the Old Testament of the Holy Word of God that he removed from the Bible. Only the vehement opposition of his own followers prevented him from doing so. If he had his way, Protestants today would be an incomplete Bible of 63 books rather than an incomplete Bible of 66 books.

By: Edward L

Edward L — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:13:52 +0000

Bible: Philosophy, origin and teachinghttp: / / http://www.onelittleangel.com / wisdom / quo …
The Protestant Bible has 66 books. The Roman Catholic version, including the Deuterocanonical books, has a total of 76 books, while Eastern Orthodox version includes 77 or more. (4 Maccabees is sometimes included in an appendix, sometimes not, "Ezra's prophecies" are sometimes present, sometimes not).
Bible Canon - Which books are biblical?
Main article: Biblical canon, Books of the Bible
As noted above, Jewish, Protestant, Catholic and Orthodox traditions have slightly different canons of the Hebrew Bible. For Jews, the canon was decided between 200 BC and 200 AD, in particular the Council of Jamnia in 92. The Christian canons that were developed separately, with the Protestant canon was decided at the time of the Reformation of Martin Luther and the Catholic canon definitively confirmed at the Council of Trent.

By: The Dark Side

The Dark Side — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:13:52 +0000

Ignorance of the history of the church - Protestants tend to know only about their own name (yes), and not what was before it started, and many assume that everyone else is wrong. A greater knowledge of history would stop a lot of misunderstanding in many other fields as well as the present. Of course, you're right.

By: lyn1136

lyn1136 — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:13:52 +0000

They have not said that the reformers took the books
OUT. The lie is given that "Catholics added books"
knowing that Protestants do not check to see if this is true,
Protestants include a Jewish canon - a beginning to be
adopted by the Jews after Christianity was becoming a
a shame, with his messianic message.
traditionalMASS.org
HUTTONGIBSON.org
gerrymatatics.org
The thief Church, Patrick Henry Omlor.org

By: cashelma

cashelma — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:13:52 +0000

Perhaps because I read sites like the ignorant NISSI referred in its response, which begins with …………" The Roman Catholic Church is not Christian. "
They are simply ignorant of the history of the church.
And there always seems to say it is not Protestant.

By: Buster

Buster — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:13:52 +0000

the Bible, Catholics of the Latin Vulgate was translated by Jerome, who used the works of Orion who took the original scriptures as allegorical

By: IJR

IJR — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:13:52 +0000

It only Catholics recognize many more books of the Bible than Protestants. THe NEW TEASTEMENT is the same, only different Testemant age.

By: Max Hoopla

Max Hoopla — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:13:52 +0000

Protestants do not regard the Apocrypha as part of the canon. Catholics.

By: Yi

Yi — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:13:52 +0000

They are delusional.

By: Paul M

Paul M — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:13:52 +0000

I suppose you are referring to the Catholics and the Roman Catholic Bible.
In short, the Roman Church accepted the books in the canon of Scripture that were never accepted by the Jewish leaders. The books of the Roman Church accepted clearly lack the integrity and value of the original 66 books. I mean, just read Bel and the Dragon. It's more of a comic story of a story of God for the encouragement of literature.
Maybe you could provide a doctrine of Scripture inspired by God, that we need if everyone outside the canon were apocryphal.